Contents

GWW - logo 

W.W. Grainger (GWW) released its Q3 2018 results on October 16th. Included in these results was a ~$0.139B write-down of Goodwill and Intangible Assets. In addition to this write-down, there has been an impact to revenue by reason of the new revenue recognition accounting standard where certain service costs are reclassified from operating expense to cost of goods sold. Certain service costs have been also been reclassified from operating expense to cost of goods sold.

GWW's management has indicated that the company is trending to the high side of its earnings guidance which was communicated in July 2018.

I view the October 16th $38 pullback in GWW's stock price as a buying opportunity.

 

Summary

  • The investment community did not react well to GWW’s Q3 2018 results which were released October 16th.
  • GWW reported a $0.139B non-cash impairment charge (Goodwill and Intangible Asset write-downs) relating to the UK Cromwell business it acquired in 2015.
  • Amazon’s entry into the Industrial Equipment Wholesale business is a threat to GWW but GWW’s peers are likely more at risk.
  • After the October 16th $38 pullback in GWW’s stock price, shares are valued at ~17.6 times forward diluted earnings (~21.6 is the 5 year average).

Introduction

For several years I felt the ‘work thing’ was far overrated. When my dream of early retirement and ‘buying my life back’ finally came true just over 2  years ago I vowed I would do my utmost not to put myself in a predicament where I would HAVE to go back to work. Quite frankly, if it ever reached the stage where I HAD to go back to work I would likely go bungee jumping without a cord.

I made a commitment that I would do my utmost to ensure my investment decisions would be accurate to a far greater extent than my inaccurate calls. In this regard, I realized there would be times where I would need to zig rather than zag. In other words, there would be times when the investment community would sour on a company yet the business was still sound. This would be the time to acquire shares.

This brings us to the subject matter of this article….W.W. Grainger, Inc. (NYSE: GWW).

GWW has been on my ‘watch list’ for almost a year. During this timeframe, I have watched GWW’s stock price appreciate in value. When I have looked at the numbers, however, I have come away with the opinion that the company was overvalued.

As recently as mid-August 2018, GWW was trading above $370. After the release of Q3 results on October 16th, however, the share price dropped to ~$280; this price drop has triggered the ‘Watchlist Alert’ I created thus the prompting me to revisit GWW.

Overview

GWW, founded in 1928, is a broad line, business-to-business distributor of maintenance, repair and operating (MRO) supplies and other related products and services. Its operations are primarily in the US and Canada, with a lesser presence in Europe, Asia and Latin America.

It uses a combination of multichannel and single channel online business models to provide customers, primarily businesses, with a range of options for finding and purchasing MRO products (ie. sales representatives, contact centers, catalogs, inventory management solutions and eCommerce technology).

More than 3 million customers worldwide are serviced through a network of highly integrated distribution centers, websites, branches and inventory management solutions.

The following images provide a very high level overview of GWW.

GWW - Company Snapshot page 1

GWW - Company Snapshot page 2

In addition, you can find GWW’s Fact Book on its website. It is outdated from a financial perspective but it does provide investors with an overview of the company’s strategy and the manner in which it plans to create shareholder value.

There are 2 reportable segments:

  • the US and Canada;
  • ‘Other businesses’ which include the single channel online businesses Zoro Tools, Inc. in the U.S., MonotaRO Co., Ltd. in Japan, and operations in Europe, Asia and Latin America.

US

The majority of products sold by the U.S. business are nationally branded products. In addition, 22% of 2017 sales were private label MRO items bearing Grainger’s registered trademarks.

The U.S. business purchases products for sale from more than 2,600 suppliers, most of which are manufacturers. Through a global sourcing operation, the business procures competitively priced, high-quality products produced outside the U.S. from approximately 400 suppliers. No single supplier comprised more than 5% of total purchases and no significant barriers thus far exist with respect to sources of supply.

2017 sales were made to~1 million customers averaging 113,000 daily transactions. No single customer accounted for more than 4% of total sales.

GWW’s most recently issued catalog (February 2018) offers ~365,000 MRO products and is used by customers to assist in product selection; it includes ~24,000 new items.

GWW estimates the U.S. market for MRO products in 2017 to be ~$127B of which its U.S. business share is ~6%.

Canada

Acklands, founded in Winnipeg in 1889, was sold to Grainger in 1996 at which time the name was amended to Acklands-Grainger Inc..

This is Canada’s leading broad line MRO distributor. Much like the US segment, it provides a combination of product breadth, local availability, speed of delivery, detailed product information and competitively priced products and services.

In FY2017, ~13,000 sales transactions from GWW’s more than 131,000 stocked products were completed daily.

GWW estimates the Canadian market for MRO products in FY2017 was ~$11B, of which the Canadian business share was ~7%.

Other businesses

This group of businesses generated in excess of $0.1B in revenue in FY2017.

Zoro

This is an online MRO distributor primarily serving U.S. customers through its website, Zoro.com. It has no branches or sales force, and customer orders are primarily fulfilled through the U.S. business supply chain. It offers a broad selection of more than 1 million products.

MonotaRO

GWW operates in Japan and other Asian countries primarily through its majority interest in MonotaRO.

MRO products are provided primarily through its catalogs and websites with the majority of orders being conducted through Monotaro.com. Customers have access to ~13 million products.

GWW estimates the Japanese market for MRO products in FY2017 was ~$42B of which MonotaRO’s market share was ~2%.

Cromwell

GWW completed its acquisition of Cromwell in September 2015 for ~$0.482B. At the time of the acquisition, Cromwell’s online sales only amounted to ~5% of its annual ~$0.44B in sales and the strategic rationale for the acquisition was as follows:

GWW - Strategic Rationale for Acquiring Cromwell

GWW - Cromwell Acquisition Financials

GWW - Cromwell Deal Highlights

Source: GWW - Acquisition of Cromwell Presentation July 30 2015

Cromwell is a broad line MRO distributor in the UK that serves ~130,000 customers who have access to ~170,000 MRO products through a catalog and through Cromwell.co.uk.

GWW estimates the U.K. market for MRO products in FY2017 was ~$15B of which Cromwell's market share was ~2%.

In November 2017, Cromwell launched a new brand and website (Zoro.co.uk) and its customer orders are primarily fulfilled through the Cromwell business supply chain.

Amazon Threat

Judging from GWW’s stock chart, it would appear that peak pessimism from the investment community was evidenced in the summer of 2017 when GWW’s stock price was knocked back to the ~$163 level. This is around the time when GWW announced it was accelerating price reductions across its product portfolio to improve its competitive positioning.

Subsequent to this announcement, GWW’s revenue has grown and profitability has met expectations. Some of this revenue growth can certainly be attributed to some of GWW’s strengthening end markets but GWW’s pricing actions have most likely also contributed to this revenue growth.

While there are low barriers to entry in the product distribution business and customers and suppliers have some degree of bargaining power, GWW has managed to navigate these headwinds and historically generate decent returns.

It would, however, be naïve to think that GWW’s business going forward will not be impacted to some extent by the growing popularity of e-commerce. I suspect GWW will find the next 10 years to be more challenging than the past 10 years but I see GWW’s competitive strengths relative to its smaller competitors (HD Supply Holdings, MSC Industrial Direct, Applied Industrial Technologies, WESCO, Anixter International) giving it some cost advantages; I view Fastenal (NYSE: FAST) as being a superior competitor than the aforementioned peers.

Q3 2018 Update

On October 16th, GWW released its Q3 results. While Sales and Gross profit rose relative to Q3 2017 results, Operating and Net Earnings, Margins, and Diluted EPS were slammed.

GWW’s Operating cash flow of $~$0.367B for the quarter was a 5% increase from Q3 2017.

The all important Free Cash Flow (FCF) for Q3 2018 was ~$0.334B versus ~$0.329B for Q3 2017.

GWW - Q3 2018 Highlights

GWW - Q3 2018 Reported Results

GWW - Q3 2018 Adjusted Results

Source: GWW – Q3 2018 Earnings Presentation

While tariffs certainly impact GWW’s business, GWW is managing its business to account for this headwind.

GWW - Estimated Tariff ExposureSource: GWW – Q3 2018 Earnings Presentation

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Sure enough, here is another instance of a company which recognized Goodwill and Intangible Asset impairment charges. The $0.139B non-cash impairment charge consists of ~$0.105B Goodwill and ~$0.034B Intangible Asset impairment. Foreign currency translation and amortization of intangibles also contributed to the drop but they were nominal relative to the 2 larger items.

Fortunately, Goodwill and Intangible Assets only represent ~7.25% and ~8.1% of GWW’s Total Assets (after the impairment charges) as at the end of Q3 2018.

At the time of the Cromwell acquisition, GWW’s 5 year projections called for:

  • Double digit sales growth;
  • EBITDA margin improvement from 10% to 15%;
  • 20-25% of sales online.

The Cromwell acquisition, however, has faced some headwinds thus resulting in the write-down. The majority of the reduction in valuation is attributed to a slower growth trajectory and structural issues which include prolonged Brexit uncertainty; this uncertainty has impacted the market outlook and has resulted in higher discount rates.

In addition to the write-down, there has been an impact to revenue by reason of the new revenue recognition accounting standard where certain service costs are reclassified from operating expense to cost of goods sold. Certain service costs have also been reclassified from operating expense to cost of goods sold. More information on the items can be found in the Q3 2018 Earnings Presentation for which a link has been provided above.

NOTE: This is the second time within a month where a company I have analyzed has recognized a multi-million dollar Goodwill and/or Intangible Asset impairment charge. The other time was with Korn/Ferry (NYSE: KFY) but management had previously warned about this write-down and the rationale for the write-down was different from that at GWW.

I also discussed the issue of Goodwill and Intangible Assets in my Sherwin-Williams article (NYSE: SHW). Both Goodwill and Intangible Assets represented ~20.4% of Total Assets at FYE2016. Subsequent to the Valspar acquisition, however, SHW’s Goodwill and Intangible Assets as at FYE2017 had ballooned to over 64% of Total Assets.

Credit Ratings

Moody’s currently rates GWW’s long-term debt A3 and S&P Global rates it A+; this is a 2 notch difference. Moody’s rating is the lowest tier of the upper medium grade category while S&P’s rating is the top tier of the upper medium grade category; Moody’s downgraded GWW from A2 to A3 in May 2018. Either way, both ratings are investment grade.

Valuation

For the 9 months ending September 30th, GWW has generated the following:

GWW - Q3 2018 and 2017 GAAP to Non-GAAP Reconciliations

Source: GWW – Q3 2018 Earnings Presentation

On the October 16th Q3 conference call management indicated:

‘Finally, in July, we gave EPS guidance of $15.05 to $16.05. Further, we mentioned that it did not include the tax benefit from stock-based compensation for the second half. We’ve stayed away from predicting the exercise of stock-based awards, which is inherently difficult. Excluding that benefit, which was $0.14 in Q3, we are trending to the high-end of our guidance. As a reminder, we will provide 2019 guidance on our Q4 earnings call in January.’

What difference a day makes!

If we use GWW‘s closing stock price of ~$280 on October 16th and a conservative $15.90 EPS for the year (I prefer to err on the side of caution and am not using $16.05), we get a forward diluted PE of ~17.6; the 5 year average is ~21.6.

The $38 one-day drop in GWW’s stock price has certainly made a difference. Had I purchased GWW shares October 15th I would have acquired shares in a company with a forward diluted PE of 20 ($318/$15.90).

Historical Performance

The projected $15.90 EPS for FY2018 is certainly superior to EPS generated through 2008 – 2017 ($5.97, $5.62, $6.93, $9.07, $9.52, $11.13, $11.45, $11.58, $9.87, $10.02).

The website from which I have sourced the following images has not yet been updated to reflect the significant pullback in GWW’s stock price. I recognize the pullback in GWW’ stock price in 2016 – 2017 certainly negatively impacts GWW’s performance relative to the S&P500 but I don’t invest for the short-term. I focus on GWW’s potential returns over the long-term.

GWW vs SPY - 2 year performance

GWW vs SPY - 10 year performance

GWW vs SPY - 20 year performance

Source: Tickertech

Dividend, Dividend Yield, Dividend Payout Ratio, Stock Splits, and Share Repurchases

GWW’s dividend and stock split history can be found here.

GWW has a double digit dividend CAGR when analyzed on a 10 and 20 year basis. Growth, however, has dropped dramatically over the past few years.

GWW - Dividend CAGR 1998 - 2018

After the $38 drop in GWW’s share price to ~$280, the $5.28 dividend now provides investors with a ~1.9% dividend yield which will be less than enticing for yield hungry investors.

GWW’s dividend payout ratio has been creeping up over the years. In FY2008, the dividend payout ratio was ~25.7%. By FY2017, it had risen to ~59%. Based on projected EPS of $15.90 for the current fiscal year, the dividend payout ratio should end up being closer to 33%.

GWW continues to use the cash generated to invest in the business, repurchase shares, and distribute dividends. In Q3, GWW allocated $66 million toward CAPEX, $77 million toward dividends, and $82 million to buy back 243,000 shares; the weighted average shares adjusted for dilutive securities for the 9 months ending September 30th amounted to 56.589 million (~78 million shares were outstanding as at FYE2008).

Final Thoughts

I have found it increasingly difficult to find attractively valued companies so I was pleasantly surprised to see the extent to which the investment community reacted to GWW’s Q3 2018 Earnings Release. In hindsight I should have acquired shares when shares took a hit in 2016 – 2017 which is when many expressed concern that GWW’s business would suffer with Amazon’s entry into the Industrial Equipment – Wholesale industry.

With GWW having now retraced to a far more reasonable valuation relative to that of the past few months, I have initiated a position. I have purchased 200 shares @ $274.75/share which are held in ‘side accounts’ within the FFJ Portfolio.

I wish you much success on your journey to financial freedom.

Thanks for reading!

Note: I sincerely appreciate the time you took to read this article. Please send any feedback, corrections, or questions to [email protected].

Disclaimer: I have no knowledge of your individual circumstances and am not providing individualized advice or recommendations. I encourage you not to make any investment decision without conducting your own research and due diligence. You should also consult your financial advisor about your specific situation.

Disclosure: I am long GWW.

I wrote this article myself and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it and have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.